Poll Result
Questionnaire on Translation and Interpretation at ICANN part 1
Report date: Friday 22 November 2024 09:43 GMT
Country: All
Q0. What best describes you?
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Category |
Votes | % |
1 |
Individual Internet user |
37 | 17.96 |
2 |
Businessperson or Business Community |
34 | 16.50 |
3 |
Registry |
33 | 16.02 |
4 |
Technical community |
20 | 9.71 |
5 |
Registrar |
19 | 9.22 |
6 |
Domain Name Registrant |
17 | 8.25 |
7 |
Academia |
15 | 7.28 |
8 |
Civil Society NGO |
14 | 6.80 |
9 |
Government |
12 | 5.83 |
10 |
New gTLD applicant |
5 | 2.43 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q1. 10 languages together account for 85% of all material posted on the Internet (source: www.internetworldstats.com). Of those ten, what languages do you speak? Tick all that apply.
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
English |
169 | 82.04 |
2 |
French |
63 | 30.58 |
3 |
Spanish |
56 | 27.18 |
4 |
German |
36 | 17.48 |
5 |
Portuguese |
22 | 10.68 |
6 |
Korean |
20 | 9.71 |
7 |
Italian |
19 | 9.22 |
8 |
Arabic |
17 | 8.25 |
9 |
Chinese (Simplified / Traditional) |
14 | 6.80 |
10 |
Japanese |
8 | 3.88 |
Total votes: | 424 |
Q2. What kind of information published by ICANN do you use?
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V6.1
Opinion |
Very Often (several times per week) | Often (once or twice a week) | Occasionally (once or twice a month) | Rarely (occasionally during the year) | Never |
General Information (factsheets, FAQs, announcements, printed brochures, general information on the ICANN.org website) |
21 | 38 | 80 | 38 | 29 |
Strategic Documents (draft and final strategic and operating plans, budgets, annual reports, accountability and transparency framework, Presidents Advisory Committee reports, etc.) |
11 | 33 | 76 | 51 | 35 |
Policy Information (public consultation announcements, draft and/or final policy documents like working group reports, SSAC advisories, Issue Reports, formal statements by the GNSO Council or GNSO Constituencies, meeting information (agendas, documents being considered in meetings) for advisory committees, etc.) |
17 | 38 | 71 | 45 | 35 |
ICANN Meeting Information (information covering ICANN public meetings) |
13 | 43 | 67 | 50 | 33 |
Meeting minutes (Board meeting minutes; supporting organisation minutes; working group recordings and minutes) |
10 | 26 | 62 | 62 | 46 |
Other Information (older announcements, press releases) |
11 | 42 | 50 | 71 | 32 |
Legal Information (Bylaws, major agreements and contracts) |
10 | 29 | 51 | 83 | 33 |
Q3. Have you, or someone you know, had difficulty participating in the work of ICANN because of insufficient non-English-language materials, or interpretation at ICANN meetings, in the past?
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
No |
121 | 58.74 |
2 |
Yes |
85 | 41.26 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q4. Here is the proposed mission statement of the ICANN Translation Programme. Do you believe this is the correct mission statement? (if you answer ‘No’, please tell us why)
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
Yes |
168 | 81.55 |
2 |
No |
28 | 13.59 |
3 |
No Opinion |
10 | 4.85 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q5. Do you agree with the following statement? (taken from the draft translation programme, page 4. if you answer ‘Disagree’, please tell us why in the box provided)
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
Agree |
103 | 50.00 |
2 |
Strongly Agree |
86 | 41.75 |
3 |
Disagree |
12 | 5.83 |
4 |
Strongly Disagree |
5 | 2.43 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q5.1 A central element of the draft Translation Programme is the division of materials to be translated into certain categories as detailed immediately below from page 4 of the draft translation programme. Do you agree that this is the right approach? You may elaborate on your answer in the comment box provided.
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V6.1
Opinion |
Yes | No |
1. Outreach information to be available in: English, Chinese, Spanish, Japanese, French, German, Portuguese, Korean, Italian, Arabic, Russian (most prominent languages on the Internet) |
187 | 19 |
2. Strategic and policy documents and related written materials to be available in: English, Arabic, Simplified Chinese, French, Spanish, Russian (UN and WHO languages), though it shall always be possible to modify the languages for a given process to sui |
160 | 46 |
3. Other information (announcements, press releases, contracts, minutes of statutory bodies like the Board of Directors) to be translated as needed |
147 | 59 |
Q6 Document Management and Classification
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
Very Important |
102 | 49.51 |
2 |
Important |
81 | 39.32 |
3 |
Not Very Important |
21 | 10.19 |
4 |
Unimportant |
2 | 0.97 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q7 Document Structure and Content
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
Very Important |
112 | 54.37 |
2 |
Important |
71 | 34.47 |
3 |
Not Very Important |
22 | 10.68 |
4 |
Unimportant |
1 | 0.49 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Q8 Do you believe that there is anything which should be taken into account by the Translation Programme which is currently missing – and if so, what?
As at Poll close: Friday 20 June 2008 18:00 GMT
Number of voters: 206
Vote counting method: V1 FPTP (first-past-the-post)
Ranked by votes
Rank |
Opinion |
Votes | % |
1 |
I’m satisfied with the scope of the programme |
143 | 69.42 |
2 |
Something is missing |
63 | 30.58 |
Total votes: | 206 |
Returning Officer
Signature:
Name:
Date:
Scrutineers
Signature:
Name:
Date:
Signature:
Name:
Date:
Results generated by
BigPulse Online Voting